Log in

Park Place: Restraining order denied

Posted 9/12/17

A judge has denied a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction filed against the town by the developer of Park Place in downtown Fountain Hills.

At a hearing Thursday, Sept. 7, …

You must be a member to read this story.

Join our family of readers for as little as $5 per month and support local, unbiased journalism.


Already have an account? Log in to continue.

Current print subscribers can create a free account by clicking here

Otherwise, follow the link below to join.

To Our Valued Readers –

Visitors to our website will be limited to five stories per month unless they opt to subscribe. The five stories do not include our exclusive content written by our journalists.

For $6.99, less than 20 cents a day, digital subscribers will receive unlimited access to YourValley.net, including exclusive content from our newsroom and access to our Daily Independent e-edition.

Our commitment to balanced, fair reporting and local coverage provides insight and perspective not found anywhere else.

Your financial commitment will help to preserve the kind of honest journalism produced by our reporters and editors. We trust you agree that independent journalism is an essential component of our democracy. Please click here to subscribe.

Sincerely,
Charlene Bisson, Publisher, Independent Newsmedia

Please log in to continue

Log in
I am anchor

Park Place: Restraining order denied

Posted

A judge has denied a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction filed against the town by the developer of Park Place in downtown Fountain Hills.

At a hearing Thursday, Sept. 7, Maricopa County Superior Court Judge John Hannah made his ruling and then stayed the order for two weeks to allow N-Shea Group to file an appeal with the Arizona Court of Appeals.

The ruling will allow work to continue on the Park Place development on Avenue of the Fountains at least until the case is heard by the Court of Appeals.

N-Shea Group and its principle, Bart Shea, filed for the temporary restraining order to prevent the town from shutting down construction for $453,611 in unpaid development fees.

Town Manager Grady Miller had sent a letter to Shea dated Aug. 23, asking for $250,000 against what the town says it is owed. In his letter, Miller set Thursday, Sept. 7, as the day the town would stop construction if the funds are not paid immediately.

Shea’s court filing states that “an emergency intervention by the court is needed to bar defendant from shutting down the project until the right to development fees cause of action is resolved.”

Shea also states as points of factual background in the filing that he entered into the development agreement to ensure that his obligations to the town were specifically defined.

He adds that the development agreement contains no obligation that requires plaintiff to pay a development fee.

“No development fee is owed by the plaintiff to the town,” Shea’s claim goes on to state.

Shea warns that the consequences of a shutdown would be devastating.

“If the town were to shut down the project after building permits were issued and after construction was well on its way, that shutdown would likely cause devastating impacts at the project and would likely lead to the project not being completed.”