I am realizing that more and more people are holding meetings and discussing Agenda 21 regarding risks associated with sustainable development. I don’t think many people, including myself, realize the impact of what’s possible.
I do believe in the old adage that he who laughs first, laughs last. Does making light of the situation bring forth facts that Dina Galassini is incorrect?
You must be a member to read this story.
Join our family of readers starting at $5 for your first month and support local, unbiased journalism.
Click here to see your options for becoming a subscriber.
Register to comment
Click here create a free account for posting comments.
Note that free accounts do not include access to premium content on this site.
I am anchor
Agenda 21
Posted
Greg Larson
I am realizing that more and more people are holding meetings and discussing Agenda 21 regarding risks associated with sustainable development. I don’t think many people, including myself, realize the impact of what’s possible.
I do believe in the old adage that he who laughs first, laughs last. Does making light of the situation bring forth facts that Dina Galassini is incorrect?
Could a simple vote by our town leaders change things here? If so, how much? Would this be a gradual change? Could our local government decide to allow oversight of federal government and non-government agencies? If so, how would these agencies and their developers affect the value of our homes and our property taxes?
Do these agencies believe that city governments are incapable of their own planning and development? Valuable information on this subject can be found online. It may be a good idea to look it up.
From what I can tell, automobiles are definitely discouraged in the future, which is the future of the children. In this case perhaps Mr. Miles’ great-grandchildren.
Comments
No comments on this item Please log in to comment by clicking here