Log in

Deal-breaker

I can understand that someday Fountain Hills will have the bridge of a primary property tax to adequately maintain things. Yes, our streets are good but could use better maintenance, public service expenses will increase and I was delighted to hear that some of the tax would be used replace the very inefficiently collected Environmental Fee. But my vote is in the mail with a no, and I am sure that the yes people will consider me a bad citizen for voting that way.

The deal-breaker for me was the possible 2 percent per year cumulative increase, which to me is like signing a blank check and saying take what you need whenever you need it. There is no way I am going to sign a blank check and give it to any politician, any time, even if I did help elect them.

You must be a member to read this story.

Join our family of readers starting at $5 for your first month and support local, unbiased journalism.


Already have an account? Log in to continue.

Otherwise, follow the link below to join.

Please log in to continue

Log in
I am anchor

Deal-breaker

Posted

I can understand that someday Fountain Hills will have the bridge of a primary property tax to adequately maintain things. Yes, our streets are good but could use better maintenance, public service expenses will increase and I was delighted to hear that some of the tax would be used replace the very inefficiently collected Environmental Fee. But my vote is in the mail with a no, and I am sure that the yes people will consider me a bad citizen for voting that way.

The deal-breaker for me was the possible 2 percent per year cumulative increase, which to me is like signing a blank check and saying take what you need whenever you need it. There is no way I am going to sign a blank check and give it to any politician, any time, even if I did help elect them.

Share with others


Have an opinion on this story? Click here to send a letter to our editors.

Comments

No comments on this item Please log in to comment by clicking here