Log in

Destination

I think the lagoon idea is intriguing.

I am not sure, but I recently read in your publication that Fountain Hills wants to be a destination. This undertaking would definitely be a huge step in the fulfillment of that.

I understand this would be a whopping financial commitment but, long-term thinking, it seems to make a lot of sense. I would hope that the cost of the project and the operating costs could be defrayed by entrance fees from non-residents. I wouldn’t argue that residents shouldn’t pay a nominal fee as well.

You must be a member to read this story.

Join our family of readers starting at $5 for your first month and support local, unbiased journalism.


Already have an account? Log in to continue.

Otherwise, follow the link below to join.

Please log in to continue

Log in
I am anchor

Destination

Posted

I think the lagoon idea is intriguing.

I am not sure, but I recently read in your publication that Fountain Hills wants to be a destination. This undertaking would definitely be a huge step in the fulfillment of that.

I understand this would be a whopping financial commitment but, long-term thinking, it seems to make a lot of sense. I would hope that the cost of the project and the operating costs could be defrayed by entrance fees from non-residents. I wouldn’t argue that residents shouldn’t pay a nominal fee as well.

On the negative side of all of this is what will this do to the traffic situation? Also, what about the lighting? Will it be in direct conflict with our dark sky?

I say, “go for it!”

Share with others


Have an opinion on this story? Click here to send a letter to our editors.

Comments

No comments on this item Please log in to comment by clicking here