Log in

Opinion

Much ado about furniture

Let’s begin with the basics: the reporter still has a seat in the room. The stories still get printed. Democracy has not collapsed. The First Amendment is intact, though apparently bruised by the loss of a side table.

I’ve read the outcry — the legal theorizing, the claims of retaliation, the social media sermons about fascism and Section 1983. It’s passionate, no doubt. But it’s also nonsense. You don’t need a law degree to understand this isn’t a constitutional crisis. You just need common sense (and perhaps a brief tour through actual First Amendment law).

The press has no divine right to real estate in council chambers. That table wasn’t a constitutional guarantee, it was a courtesy. A freebie. And now it’s gone. Why? Because the people who extended the courtesy felt it was being abused. That’s not censorship. That’s the consequence of lost trust.

You must be a member to read this story.

Join our family of readers starting at $5 for your first month and support local, unbiased journalism.


Already have an account? Log in to continue.

Otherwise, follow the link below to join.

Please log in to continue

Log in