Log in

Not logical

Can a Councilmember be too naïve, too unschooled, too unaware of consequences to oversee our town?

Councilmember Allen Skillicorn’s proposal in last week’s letters to the editor, as well as at the most recent Town Council meeting, illustrates his poor qualifications for the job we elected him to do.

He proposed the town lapse the grocery tax for the month of July! Many reasons for not doing so exist; here are a few.

You must be a member to read this story.

Join our family of readers starting at $5 for your first month and support local, unbiased journalism.


Already have an account? Log in to continue.

Otherwise, follow the link below to join.

Please log in to continue

Log in
I am anchor

Not logical

Posted

Can a Councilmember be too naïve, too unschooled, too unaware of consequences to oversee our town?

Councilmember Allen Skillicorn’s proposal in last week’s letters to the editor, as well as at the most recent Town Council meeting, illustrates his poor qualifications for the job we elected him to do.

He proposed the town lapse the grocery tax for the month of July! Many reasons for not doing so exist; here are a few.

First, it’s illegal to change the tax rate in such a capricious manner. It requires all kinds of hearings and postings and legalities to do so.

Next, Skillicorn’s proposal would require all grocery and convenience stores, including Target, to pay to change their point of sale cash registers and then pay once again to return them in August.

Next, he thinks he can eliminate suspending the State sales tax of 8.9 percent. Fountain Hills’ portion of that tax is only 2.9%. Furthermore, the folks who really need grocery money – those receiving SNAP benefits – are already exempt from food tax.

And finally, most residents would much rather give the tiny $5-$10 we’d save on food tax in the month of July and put it toward road improvements. Councilman Skillicorn is constantly voting no on spending proposals in order to send the money toward road improvements. Yet here he is, trying to eliminate a couple hundred thousand tax dollars which could go toward road improvements.

Not at all logical.

Share with others


Have an opinion on this story? Click here to send a letter to our editors.

Comments

No comments on this item Please log in to comment by clicking here