Log in

Photo enforcement

I agree with a recent letter regarding photo enforcement. Photo enforcement is a more effective way to maintain speeds within speed limits and stop red-light runners.

It targets speeders and red-light runners while freeing up police time and not endangering police lives. Police officers are busy enough. Why would we want to ban tools that reduce accidents and free up police time for more important issues?

It seems that only speeders and red-light runners would be happy to see SB1234 that bans photo enforcement become law.

You must be a member to read this story.

Join our family of readers starting at $5 for your first month and support local, unbiased journalism.


Already have an account? Log in to continue.

Otherwise, follow the link below to join.

Please log in to continue

Log in
I am anchor

Photo enforcement

Posted

I agree with a recent letter regarding photo enforcement. Photo enforcement is a more effective way to maintain speeds within speed limits and stop red-light runners.

It targets speeders and red-light runners while freeing up police time and not endangering police lives. Police officers are busy enough. Why would we want to ban tools that reduce accidents and free up police time for more important issues?

It seems that only speeders and red-light runners would be happy to see SB1234 that bans photo enforcement become law.

Share with others


Have an opinion on this story? Click here to send a letter to our editors.

Comments

No comments on this item Please log in to comment by clicking here