P&Z delays discussion on controversial Daybreak plan
P&Z meet
The Planning and Zoning Commission delayed its discussion and recommendation regarding the Daybreak apartment plan proposed for Fountain Hills.
The commission considered a continuance at the request of the developer. Paul Gilbert, an attorney for the developer, asked the commission to postpone its action until Thursday, Aug. 8. He said the developers wanted another chance to meet with residents in the area of the proposed project. However, the motion made by the commission set the date for Sept. 12.
Gilbert then told the commission that if they were going to delay until September his client preferred to go forward at the July 25 session. However, Commission Chair Susan Dempster noted that the motion had already been made and seconded and she called for the vote. The motion to delay until Sept. 12 passed on a 5-1 vote.
You must be a member to read this story.
Join our family of readers starting at $5 for your first month and support local, unbiased journalism.
Click here to see your options for becoming a subscriber.
Register to comment
Click here create a free account for posting comments.
Note that free accounts do not include access to premium content on this site.
I am anchor
P&Z delays discussion on controversial Daybreak plan
P&Z meet
Posted
The Planning and Zoning Commission delayed its discussion and recommendation regarding the Daybreak apartment plan proposed for Fountain Hills.
The commission considered a continuance at the request of the developer. Paul Gilbert, an attorney for the developer, asked the commission to postpone its action until Thursday, Aug. 8. He said the developers wanted another chance to meet with residents in the area of the proposed project. However, the motion made by the commission set the date for Sept. 12.
Gilbert then told the commission that if they were going to delay until September his client preferred to go forward at the July 25 session. However, Commission Chair Susan Dempster noted that the motion had already been made and seconded and she called for the vote. The motion to delay until Sept. 12 passed on a 5-1 vote.
An audience of about 200 had come ready to discuss the plan but the public hearing was not opened.
Comments
No comments on this item Please log in to comment by clicking here