In response to the letter on pluralism from last week, I am curious as to who exactly gets to define “superior” as it relates to both cars and religion?

I happen to drive a Toyota Prius, which I am certain is the best car for me. I would not be so presumptive as to make the claim that the Prius is superior to all other cars, or the best car for all other drivers.

The statement “Why would anyone follow a religion they didn’t believe was best” appears to be missing the appropriate ending, “for themselves.”

I have never heard a Rabbi or Imam state that the religion they practice is superior to another. In fact, I have seldom heard the term “supremacy” except as it relates to some scary, extremist ideologies.

The teachings of Jesus are not about supremacy of one religion over another. They are not even about religion. They are about tolerance, acceptance, kindness and forgiveness.

Christianity is dying in part because of its arrogance, but also because of its association with those who are intolerant, unaccepting, unkind and unforgiving. In other words, those who believe they can define “superior” for everyone.

I am a Christian, one who is proud to stand up for my faith and equally proud to stand up for the faith of others. I would agree with the Christian minister, pluralism, the existence of groups with different ethnic, religious, or political backgrounds within one society, should be celebrated.

Not just on Pluralism Sunday, but every day.