There has been much discussion in town lately about the proper role of an elected official. Yes, it is an elected official’s role to hold administrators and staff members accountable, as well as making sure the adopted budget is being followed.

But some local officials appear to be taking it too far and really don’t understand their proper role.

According to the League of Arizona Cities and Towns, elected officials shouldn’t micro-manage and they shouldn’t delve into tiny details. Their job is to vote on “policy” and fiscal affairs. This applies to the Town Council, the School Board and the Sanitary District Board (all publicly elected officials).

The league has published a marvelous booklet called “What all elected local officials need to know.”

It states, “Getting wrapped up in administrative detail is time consuming and only can be accomplished at the expense of one of your other priorities. Generally, it has been found that paying too much attention to detail will cause your policy making role to suffer.”

Some also forget that if they are on the minority side of some issues, they should accept the majority’s decision and move on.

The league booklet states, “Have your say on each issue and ask questions of the other positions, but remember above all this is a team job and that a united front after the decision is necessary to carry your community forward and to perpetuate public trust.”

With the upcoming FHUSD bond package on the ballot, is the full School Board presenting a united front? Are all five perpetuating public trust?

The time is right for this bond package because the capital improvement money is needed to enhance our school buildings and attract more students to the district. Isn’t that one of the district’s goals?