Obama is extending a helping hand to traditional enemies of America like Iran and Cuba because he doesn’t believe Islamists or Communists pose a threat to world peace, but the threat is “Anglo-American imperialist domination.”

So by opposing those he considers allies of American expansionism, he furthers his role of making the world an equitable place by supporting those he sees as fellow freedom fighters against imperialist domination.

What other explanation is there as to why Obama would support popular uprising against pro-American regimes in Egypt and Libya while ignoring popular uprising against anti-American regime in Iran?

Last April, communist dictator of Cuba, Raul Castro, gave a speech at the Seventh Summit of the Americas in which he lambasted America for two centuries of imperial aggression, yet issued a personal statement absolving Obama of responsibility for those past actions.

Castro noted that Cuba may have acted in solidarity with other people who may be considered terrorists in the past, but only against imperialism. Rather than contradict Castro, Obama acknowledged that America owes a debt to the rest of the world and promised that America would never meddle in Latin American affairs.

Obama views Cuba’s suffering not as a result of communism, but the result of Anglo-American imperialist domination.

On the domestic front, Obama has neutered local police forces, knowingly released thousands of convicted criminals onto American streets and granted amnesty to millions of illegal immigrants flooding across the southern border. Sure sounds like a national security nightmare.

But the end will justify the means, according to Obama’s communist friends, Frank Marshall Davis, Bill Ayers, Saul Alinsky and George Soros, believing police are nothing but agents of capitalism devoted to oppressing the proletarian masses.

Police and law-abiding citizens must suffer to make the world more equitable.